🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

An Impending Danger to Ancient Graveyards

Local authorities have identified three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer sites. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got under 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that people’s remains will just get washed out to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper killed while serving abroad. His parent expressed she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does trouble me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an significant site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an early decision must be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Solutions and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the challenge has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Several families want more coastal protections to delay the inevitable erosion and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the time for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive community discussions to find the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sorrow for the area,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of sacred ground.