Trump Says Peace Proposal Is Not 'Final Offer' as Representatives Convene for Swiss Meeting
Ex-leader Donald Trump stated on Saturday that his Moscow-drafted peace plan constituted not his ultimate proposal, after intense reaction from Ukrainian leaders and commentators that compared it to a Munich pact of 1938 between Neville Chamberlain and Adolf Hitler.
In short remarks at the White House, the US president told journalists: Our goal is to achieve peace. This should have occurred earlier … we are attempting to conclude it, one way or the other we have to get it ended."
Upcoming Switzerland Talks Involve Multiple Countries
Ukrainian and American delegates are scheduled to meet in Geneva this Sunday to discuss this proposal. Security officials from Germany, France, and the UK are expected to join the talks there.
Ahead of the talks, US senators informed media outlets that State Department head Marco Rubio contacted them during his travel to Geneva to clarify the details of this disclosed proposal. He said, this plan "was not the administration’s plan" but instead reflected Russian desires, according to independent Maine senator King, who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee.
Zelenskyy Faces Crucial Deadline
However, the former president has given Zelenskyy until Thursday to sign the 28-point document. It calls on Kyiv to cede territory it currently controls to Moscow, downsize the size of its army, and surrender long-range weapons. Additionally, it rules out international peacekeepers and penalties for atrocities committed by Russia.
During a solemn speech last Friday, the Ukrainian leader cautioned that his country confronts a difficult decision over the coming days between keeping its national dignity and losing a major partner in the shape of the US. He admitted that Ukraine is experiencing one of the most difficult moments in its history.
Ukrainian Dialogue Delegation Appointed for Geneva Talks
Speaking on Saturday, the president said that real or respectable resolution was always based on assured safety and fairness. He announced a negotiating team, appointed through a decree, which will meet its US counterparts in Switzerland, led by his chief of staff Andriy Yermak.
Another member from Ukraine's team, ex-defense head and security council official Umerov, stated there would be discussions with the US "on the possible parameters of a future peace agreement".
Hinting at limits, Umerov added: Ukraine enters these talks with defined goals. This represents a continuation of recent discussions focused on harmonizing our plans for future actions."
Global Reaction and Concerns
Zelenskyy has attempted to engage constructively with a White House apparently intent to end the conflict on the Kremlin’s one-sided terms. He has emphasized that he will not surrender the nation's independence or abandon the constitutional framework that protects the country’s current borders.
At a meeting in South Africa, G20 leaders and the European Council released a joint statement pushing back on the proposed deal, saying it needs further refinement. It said that EU and Nato members would need to be consulted regarding certain clauses, which rule out Ukraine's NATO accession and put conditions on its European Union membership.
Citizen Opinion in Ukraine's Capital
Responses from Ukrainians to the proposal, prepared by a Russian representative and a US delegate, have been largely negative. Analysts argued it was a blueprint for another Russian invasion: targeting not just Ukraine but of other parts of Europe too.
Mustafa Nayyem, a journalist and politician involved in the 2014 Maidan protests, remarked it invited parallels with Chamberlain’s infamous Munich deal. Trumps’s peace plan came from the same "recognisable genre", where the affected party is asked "to formulate his own defeat so everyone else can live easier".
In a Facebook post, Nayyem said he was outraged by the complete pardon for Russian atrocities. It was an insult people who had hidden in basements in affected cities – sites of civilian executions – and for those whose children had been forcibly deported to Russian territory. "A rather cynical agreement," he concluded.
Speaking in a Kyiv subway station, Sariskyi, 21, commented that Moscow had been trying to control Ukraine politically and territorially "for years". The agreement offered very little in the proposed deal and continued to keep its forces on Ukrainian soil. In my view, this deal aims to undermine Ukraine and impose unfair terms, he remarked.
If Zelenskyy signed off on the proposals it would be compelled to give up its freedoms, he said. If rejected, the US might cease collaboration and intelligence exchange, a crucial source of battlefield information for frontline Ukrainian troops. Currently, there is no favorable solution, he noted.
Varied Viewpoints from the Public
Another passenger, teenager Barchan, said that Ukraine would "keep strong" lacking US backing. We will continue our struggle as needed. Our territory will remain our territory, including Crimea and the east. They are Ukrainian land." She said that the president is intelligent and predicted he would not cede territory.
Speaking in the rain, next to a replica of Kyiv’s original medieval gate, Olena Ivanovna said her appreciation to the former US leader for his peace-making efforts. She suggested that the nation should be ready to give away certain regions temporarily if it meant maintaining US support. "President Zelenskyy should hold a referendum and ask the people," she proposed.
EU Officials Criticize the Plan
Previous European leaders have roundly condemned this proposal. Finland’s former prime minister Sanna Marin called it a disaster, affecting not just Ukraine but for "all of the democratic world". She said if the west showed weakness and ignorance – similar to the 2014 Crimea annexation – "more aggression and conflicts" would follow.
The former prime minister of Belgium, Verhofstadt, quoted Churchill’s definition of an appeaser as someone who accommodates an aggressor. He continued: Trump aligns with Putin. Europe must choose again: appeasement or our values, imperialism or freedom. A critical juncture for the European Union."